Comparative Essays: Comparing Two Texts
A guide to the comparative essay for senior English, in which two texts are put in conversation about an idea. Using two original…
- Difficulty
- Level 3 · Challenge
- Time
- 35 min
The skills that separate a good English exam result from a very good one: reading the command term accurately, unpacking the question, planning an essay in five minutes, writing to time and finishing. Includes a command-term table, a worked question unpacking, a minute-by-minute plan for a 40-minute essay and a procedure for what to do when time runs out. Written for HSC/VCE-style examinations and useful for every timed essay in Year 12.
Instant download · No sign-up · Free for personal, classroom and homeschool use
Curriculum: Australian Curriculum. We show specific outcome codes only where they have been verified against the official curriculum document.
Completed: Exam Technique: Planning, Timing and Command Terms
Year 12 students (typically ages 17–18) working on text analysis & essays. It is pitched at level 3 · challenge.
This is a study guide, so there is no separate answer sheet; the 'Check yourself' questions include answers.
About 25 minutes. Short, regular sessions work best: two or three a week beats one long one.
No. Click Download Free PDF and it opens immediately. It is free for personal, classroom and homeschool use.
Try Essay Planning Workshop.
Year 12 · English · Text Analysis & Essays
Student name:
Date:
In a timed English exam, the difference between a good and a very good result is rarely knowledge of the text. It is reading the question accurately, planning quickly, writing to time and finishing. Each of these is a skill that can be practised in advance until it is automatic. This guide covers command terms (the verbs that tell you what kind of answer is wanted), a five-minute planning method, and how to handle the clock, including what to do when it beats you.
| Command term | What it asks for | What a strong answer does |
|---|---|---|
| Analyse | Break down how parts (techniques, structure, form) create meaning | Names specific choices and explains their effect, always linked to an idea |
| Compare | Identify similarities and differences | Moves between texts within paragraphs; uses difference to sharpen the argument |
| Evaluate / Assess | Make a judgement about value, effectiveness or significance, against criteria | States the judgement early, supports it, and acknowledges limits |
| Explain | Give reasons; show how and why | Cause and effect in a clear sequence, with examples |
| Discuss | Identify issues and give points for and/or against | Considers more than one reading before settling on a position |
| To what extent | Judge the degree to which a statement is true | Takes a measured position ('largely', 'only partly') and argues both the extent and the limit |
| Explore | Investigate an idea from several angles | Ranges across the whole text; shows nuance and development |
| Justify | Give reasons for a position | Evidence-led; anticipates and answers objections |
| Examine | Inquire into in close detail | Close reading with precise evidence and sustained attention to language |
| How does ... | Focus on method | Technique and form foregrounded in every paragraph |
Unpacking a question in four steps. Question: 'Texts about belonging are really texts about exclusion.' To what extent does your prescribed text support this view?
The five-minute plan
Prepare three or four flexible ideas about each text, not three fixed paragraphs, and attach four or five quotations with techniques to each idea. In the exam, ask of each idea: how does it help answer this question? Rename the idea in the question's terms, choose the two or three quotations that fit best and drop the rest. A paragraph that argues two points well will always beat one that forces in five memorised quotations.
If you run out of time
Answers: 1. A measured judgement about degree: you must argue how far the statement is true and where it stops being true, not only break the text down. 2. e.g. 'Largely true: my text uses its historical setting to interrogate present attitudes to land and ownership, though its final chapter insists the past also has a claim of its own.' 3. About five minutes: a one-line position, three topic-sentence ideas, two pieces of evidence with technique under each, an order for the paragraphs, and a full thesis sentence. 4. The thesis and topic sentences will not match the question's terms, so the response reads as off-task and is capped regardless of quality. 5. Write a short, direct version of the paragraph (topic sentence, one quotation with effect, link) in three minutes, then a two-sentence conclusion. Do not try to write the paragraph in full. 6. (b) evaluate.
Preview — the PDF contains the full resource.
A guide to the comparative essay for senior English, in which two texts are put in conversation about an idea. Using two original…
A practical method for the unseen-text section of senior English exams: a five-step first-read routine, what to look for in prose, poetry,…
A structured workshop in which students plan an analytical essay from an original prompt on an original short text, 'High Water', about a…
Study Guide · Year 11 · Text Analysis & Essays · Level 2 · Standard
Study Guide · Year 11 · Text Analysis & Essays · Level 2 · Standard
Free to print and share for personal, classroom and homeschool use. Please don't resell. Spotted an error? Let us know.